After sessions ending at 4 am, do gender issues count?
At Rio de Janeiro's June 8-10, 2005 World Summit on the Information SocietySource: APC ICT Policy Handbook and APC Annual Report 2005.">i (WSIS)* regional Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Conference, representatives of international organisations -- including financing institutions -- reflected this problem. They had a hard time to link their well prepared discourses on ICT development to the people’s social, economic, political and cultural rights, not to mention gender justice.
Many of these organisations have spent a good amount of money to pay for experts to research and write-up on gender issues. This is reflected on papers uploaded to their websites.
Most are good documents and the organisations are happy to show how they follow these politically-correct gender policies in their programmes and projects around the world.
But when it comes to telecommunications and ICTs, and discussing the need to build an inclusive information society, they leave these policies aside. They don’t seem to find a case for gender issues in their ICT policies.
Are government"state" in this glossary). As a general rule, "government" should not be capitalised.
Source: Wikipedia">irepresentatives different?
Only a handful of them included gender issues in their concerns and had enough courage to discuss openly -- in plenary sessions and in committee meetings -- the need for mainstreaming gender in ICT policies.
One country proposed that a gender dimension should become a cross-cutting axis in the Plan of Action and that a working group to incorporate this dimension should be created. But this was not even discussed.
So there was a lot to be done by civil society organisations"What is civil society?", initial working definition adopted by the Centre for Civil Society at the London School of Economics">i, and women´s organisations, in the Rio Conference. It was not an easy task, as only plenary sessions were open to all participants. Committee meetings, where the real decisions took place, could only be attended by government representatives.
At this point, work done by civil society representatives in their own countries, prior to the conference, became very valuable. Activists were able to discuss the issues and lobbyStyle information: N/a
Civil society representatives who were members of government delegations were of great help, too. On many occasions they were able to put forward and support civil society interests, including specific language in the final documents.
Thanks to these interventions, governments committed themselves to create ICT public access centres and also to grant access to community radio and TV stations using ICTs. They also made the commitment to promote Free and Open Source SoftwareFree Software Foundation ">i (FOSS), specially in education and digital inclusion programmes.
After three days of intense debate, with sessions even ending at 4 am, the conference was able to produce the 'Rio de Janeiro Commitment' and the 'Regional Action Plan -- eLac2007Style information: There is no space between eLAC and 2007: eLAC2007 is the correct spelling.
Source: eLAC page on ECLAC website and "Participation, the Achilles heel of eLAC2007", APCNews (6 July 2006)
Source: eLAC page on ECLAC website and "Participation, the Achilles heel of eLAC2007", APCNews (6 July 2006) ">i' (see Related Links).
Both documents open the way to the implementation of ICT policies in the region that take into account national interests and people's rights. There are a few specific mentions of women and gender issues in both documents, related mainly to training and building gender indicators, but the concern for fostering an inclusive information society is present in them.
Civil society organisations will now have the difficult task of monitoring the implementation of the Action Plan, and of securing effective and democratic participation in its development.
*WSIS is a UN-sponsored conference about information and communication. The summit happens twice: its first part took place in December 2003 in Geneva. Phase two will take place in November 2005 in Tunis. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) took the lead in organizing the event, which includes the participation of more than 50 heads of state"government" in this glossary). As a general rule, "state" should not be capitalised.
Source: Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document (Glossary of key terms) and Wikipedia">i. WSIS is also related to UNESCO. When the 2003 summit failed to agree on the future of Internet governanceSource: Tunis Agenda for the Information Society">i, the Working Group on Interneti Governance (WGIG) was formed to come up with ideas on how to progress.
13 Apr 2015 - 17:33 on Porn. Panic. Ban.
26 Mar 2015 - 04:56 on Tools discussed: Gender and ICTs in education and communication
25 Feb 2015 - 15:37 on Rape and the courts: Going online isn't really justice
23 Feb 2015 - 13:21 on The false paradox: freedom of expression and sexist hate speech
15 Apr 2015 - 21:35
12 Jan 2015 - 03:30
25 Sep 2014 - 17:09
20 Aug 2014 - 13:57